Spreader Bar Cable Application: What is a spreader bar? Container crane context: Gantry crane positioned at dock Overhead hoist mechanism: Winch + trolley system Spreader bar: Attachment point below hoist Function: Grips container corners, distributes load, tilts container for placement Spreader bar structure: Framework: Steel tubes/beams forming rectangular frame Lifting points: 4 corner attachment rings (one per container corner) Electrical system: Motor-driven locks, position sensors, lighting Cables: Power supply for motors + control signals for locking mechanism Cable location (spreader bar): Vertical run (primary): From crane hoist (top) down 20–40 m to spreader bar (bottom) Function: Supply power for: - Corner lock solenoids (release container locks) - Position feedback sensors (confirm locks engaged) - Optional: Spreader bar lighting (visibility during operation) Simultaneous function: Act as partial mechanical support (share load with main hoist cable) Horizontal distribution (on spreader bar): From entry point distributed across spreader frame Supply all four corner lock motors Branching: May split into smaller branches (4× circuits to corners) Mechanical load: Cable must withstand: Static tension: Weight of container payload (20–40 tons distributed) Dynamic loads: Jerking during load acceleration, swinging in wind Thermal: Tropical port environment, direct sun, saltwater spray Abrasion: Rubbing against spreader frame during operation Cable design philosophy: Dual function (unique): Electrical function: Deliver 300/500V power for locking system Mechanical function: Share load-bearing (not primary structure, but support role) Different from: Pure electrical cables (festoon, lifting): Electrical function only Pure mechanical ropes: Mechanical function only BASKET SPREADER 730: Both functions integrated Speed specification rationale: 160 m/min (relatively slow): Container crane cycle time: ~45–60 seconds per lift Descent distance: 20–40 m Descent speed: 20–40 m ÷ 45–60 sec = 0.33–0.9 m/s = 20–54 m/min Average speed: ~30 m/min (loading) + 20 m/min (discharge) = 25 m/min 160 m/min specification: 6–8× safety margin on speed Design: Allows for fast emergency ascent if needed Why not higher speed? Mechanical load constraint: Heavy cable (4000 N = ~400 kg equivalent) Inertia: Accelerating 400 kg + spreader bar + container inertia takes time Structural: Crane frame limits acceleration rates (safety interlocks) Result: 160 m/min is practical maximum for loaded spreader bar

on15/05/2026

BASKET SPREADER 730

Spreader Bar Cable Application: What is a spreader bar? Container crane context: Gantry crane positioned at dock Overhead hoist mechanism: Winch + trolley system Spreader bar: Attachment point below hoist Function: Grips container corners, distributes load, tilts container for placement Spreader bar structure: Framework: Steel tubes/beams forming rectangular frame Lifting points: 4 corner attachment rings (one per container corner) Electrical system: Motor-driven locks, position sensors, lighting Cables: Power supply for motors + control signals for locking mechanism Cable location (spreader bar): Vertical run (primary): From crane hoist (top) down 20–40 m to spreader bar (bottom) Function: Supply power for: – Corner lock solenoids (release container locks) – Position feedback sensors (confirm locks engaged) – Optional: Spreader bar lighting (visibility during operation) Simultaneous function: Act as partial mechanical support (share load with main hoist cable) Horizontal distribution (on spreader bar): From entry point distributed across spreader frame Supply all four corner lock motors Branching: May split into smaller branches (4× circuits to corners) Mechanical load: Cable must withstand: Static tension: Weight of container payload (20–40 tons distributed) Dynamic loads: Jerking during load acceleration, swinging in wind Thermal: Tropical port environment, direct sun, saltwater spray Abrasion: Rubbing against spreader frame during operation Cable design philosophy: Dual function (unique): Electrical function: Deliver 300/500V power for locking system Mechanical function: Share load-bearing (not primary structure, but support role) Different from: Pure electrical cables (festoon, lifting): Electrical function only Pure mechanical ropes: Mechanical function only BASKET SPREADER 730: Both functions integrated Speed specification rationale: 160 m/min (relatively slow): Container crane cycle time: ~45–60 seconds per lift Descent distance: 20–40 m Descent speed: 20–40 m ÷ 45–60 sec = 0.33–0.9 m/s = 20–54 m/min Average speed: ~30 m/min (loading) + 20 m/min (discharge) = 25 m/min 160 m/min specification: 6–8× safety margin on speed Design: Allows for fast emergency ascent if needed Why not higher speed? Mechanical load constraint: Heavy cable (4000 N = ~400 kg equivalent) Inertia: Accelerating 400 kg + spreader bar + container inertia takes time Structural: Crane frame limits acceleration rates (safety interlocks) Result: 160 m/min is practical maximum for loaded spreader bar

Design Comparison (LIFT-1S UL vs. LIFT-2S UL): LIFT-1S UL: Temperature: 105°C (highest rating) Steel cores: 1 (single mechanical support) Redundancy philosophy: Electrical backup (dual control circuits) Yellow sheath: No (black) Insulation: PVC only (100% pure) Mylar wrap: No Size example (8G1.5): ~21.5 mm OD Cost: Higher (premium 105°C formulation) Best for: High-temperature machine rooms, non-HVAC spaces LIFT-2S UL: Temperature: 90°C (moderate rating) Steel cores: 2 (dual mechanical support) Redundancy philosophy: Mechanical backup (if one core fails, other works) Yellow sheath: Yes (RAL 1021, safety identification) Insulation: PVC/Nylon hybrid (enhanced protection) Mylar wrap: Yes (additional conductor protection) Size example (8G1.5): ~22.7 mm OD (slightly larger due to dual cores) Cost: Moderate (balanced design) Best for: Standard elevator duty, mechanical redundancy required Philosophy difference: LIFT-1S UL approach: "Design the cable to never overheat" - Optimize for high temperature (105°C possible) - Single mechanical core (simpler, lighter) - Control circuit provides electrical safety backup - Assumes: Machine room temperature controlled (or naturally cool) - Risk: If machine room exceeds 90°C ambient, marginal safety LIFT-2S UL approach: "Design for mechanical redundancy + moderate conditions" - Accept standard 90°C temperature (sufficient for most installations) - Dual mechanical cores (if one damaged/broken, other maintains function) - Better long-term reliability (don't rely on control circuit for mechanical failure) - Assumes: Some machines rooms may exceed 80°C, but not 90°C - Benefit: Fail-safe mechanical backup (independent of electrical system) Application selection: Choose LIFT-1S UL if: ✓ Machine room is non-air-conditioned, exposed to sun ✓ Building has no climate control in elevator shaft ✓ Located in tropical climate with extreme heat ✓ Temperature analysis shows >85°C sustained possible ✓ Willing to pay premium for 105°C rating Choose LIFT-2S UL if: ✓ Standard commercial elevator in air-conditioned building ✓ Mechanical redundancy more important than temperature headroom ✓ Budget-conscious (LIFT-2S UL lower cost than LIFT-1S UL) ✓ Temperature typically

Technical Department

on15/05/2026

LIFT-2S UL

Design Comparison (LIFT-1S UL vs. LIFT-2S UL): LIFT-1S UL: Temperature: 105°C (highest rating) Steel cores: 1 (single mechanical support) Redundancy philosophy: Electrical backup (dual control circuits) Yellow sheath: No (black) Insulation: PVC only (100% pure) Mylar wrap: No Size example (8G1.5): ~21.5 mm OD Cost: Higher (premium 105°C formulation) Best for: High-temperature machine rooms, non-HVAC spaces LIFT-2S UL: Temperature: 90°C (moderate rating) Steel cores: 2 (dual mechanical support) Redundancy philosophy: Mechanical backup (if one core fails, other works) Yellow sheath: Yes (RAL 1021, safety identification) Insulation: PVC/Nylon hybrid (enhanced protection) Mylar wrap: Yes (additional conductor protection) Size example (8G1.5): ~22.7 mm OD (slightly larger due to dual cores) Cost: Moderate (balanced design) Best for: Standard elevator duty, mechanical redundancy required Philosophy difference: LIFT-1S UL approach: “Design the cable to never overheat” – Optimize for high temperature (105°C possible) – Single mechanical core (simpler, lighter) – Control circuit provides electrical safety backup – Assumes: Machine room temperature controlled (or naturally cool) – Risk: If machine room exceeds 90°C ambient, marginal safety LIFT-2S UL approach: “Design for mechanical redundancy + moderate conditions” – Accept standard 90°C temperature (sufficient for most installations) – Dual mechanical cores (if one damaged/broken, other maintains function) – Better long-term reliability (don’t rely on control circuit for mechanical failure) – Assumes: Some machines rooms may exceed 80°C, but not 90°C – Benefit: Fail-safe mechanical backup (independent of electrical system) Application selection: Choose LIFT-1S UL if: ✓ Machine room is non-air-conditioned, exposed to sun ✓ Building has no climate control in elevator shaft ✓ Located in tropical climate with extreme heat ✓ Temperature analysis shows >85°C sustained possible ✓ Willing to pay premium for 105°C rating Choose LIFT-2S UL if: ✓ Standard commercial elevator in air-conditioned building ✓ Mechanical redundancy more important than temperature headroom ✓ Budget-conscious (LIFT-2S UL lower cost than LIFT-1S UL) ✓ Temperature typically